• x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like how AI note takers are basically converting the useless act of a meeting into an email because an email is a better product that someone can reference.

    If you meeting needs to be converted into an email to make it useful maybe you should just write more emails and have fewer meetings.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      If it can be summarized into an email without anyone else’s input, it was a bad meeting and should’ve been a mail to start with. A good meeting is not about transferring freely available info, but about discussion and decision making.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The communist presidential candidate in my country has a live interview in one hour. Just in time for the metrics work meeting that could have been an email.

    This will be fun.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ahhh Google Meet. In the corporate world when we see a company using Google Meet we assume they are cheap and we will need to really talk discounts etc with them. It’s sadly normally true.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny. In the tech world we see zoom vs google meet as zoom is for people who have exclusively soft skills I don’t want to talk to anyway. When I see a google meeting I know I’m going to be talking to someone useful.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Depends on what part of the company you are dealing with - in engineering we’re usually a bit annoyed when anything other gets used simply because meeting software clients for Linux are either shitty or nonexistent.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    using an ai for inside meeting is totally safe and secure, and totally not a gdpr nightmare

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I work in government, and some dumbass in the city sends one of these things instead of attending meetings, and gets pissy when I kick it out of the room.

    Those emails it sends are open-records discoverable.

  • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Kinda off-topic, but am I the only one who usually joins meetings five minutes early? I hate being late, and that way I give myself five minutes of peaceful troubleshooting time if my mic doesn’t connect, for example.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Five is already pretty late for me. I’m in the meeting 10 prior so my status changes. Camera is off, I’m preparing for the meeting, but it’s good to be ahead of the game.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Always in exactly 2 minutes early. 5 minutes early always forces me to have awkward small talk with someone, usually the organizer.

      2 minutes is great. 30 seconds to get in, 1 minute for mic/sound check, 30 seconds left not long enough to have more small talk than hellos.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I almost always see the message “x has started the meeting. Join?” About 5 to 10 minutes before a meeting where x is any of many people, so you’re not unusual

      I join exactly on time, though I get to the audio/video check a few minutes early to ensure my camera is live and the audio has chosen my headset not the camera microphone

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m hyperpunctual too, but I stopped doing this when Teams started pinging all invitees as soon as the first person shows up, because now showing up 5 minutes early just means the meeting is 5 minutes longer.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I go for not being the guy to start the meeting, but being prepared to join the second someone does.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      That would annoy me, since Teams shows a “meeting started” popup when the first person joins a meeting.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        but wouldn’t then people understand that the meeting has not yet begun? it’d be like a door opening at x:55 when the class starts at x+1:00, an open invitation to start gathering but the official start is in 5 minutes as scheduled

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sometimes people take other people joining early as a cue that the meeting starts early, so there’s a chance I’d miss stuff. Our company is very good with meetings actually making sense, so missing 5 minutes can be quite annoying.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            okay question because i don’t know if i’m out of touch with corporate culture or just not american- are you amarican?

            because afaik in Europe it’d be considered rude to begin a meeting before a scheduled time, unless everyone who was supposed to be there is there and agrees that they’d like to start early

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I have all that turned off. A new chat pertaining to the meeting is added to the list of chats, but I don’t see that unless I’m looking at the Teams window.

      • Azteh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you’ve already made sure the mic and camera are working, you don’t need to enter the 2nd meeting 5 minutes early to make sure they work.

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Man, just do it like the rest of us and join on time. Then realize you forgot to do sth/take a break/whatever and just claim the 5 minute troubleshoot time claiming your mic doesn’t work, while you go to the toilet.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, they would wait for me in most meetings. In 75% of the meetings I participate in, I’m a key person and have to provide meaningful information, some of it based on the discussion in the meetings. If I had “mic issues” in them, they’d want me to start showing up early to address them before the meeting. And thus we’re back to square one.

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    A real hero would start talking about viagra and car insurance, and get the meeting emails flagged as spam.

    • hansolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just start reading subject lines from spam emails.

      “You’ve won $10,000! – Horny women in your area! – Real Casino Viagra Casino Bitcoin Casino Viagra! – There’s a package awaiting your confirmation!”

  • Metz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    …virtual note takers? we don’t even write our own fucking notes anymore?..

    edit:

    Okay, okay, I get it :D AI indeed has some uses.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Transcribing meetings is quite useful if you want to quickly check something later on.

      Summarizing that is useful to get the gist of it if you missed the meeting.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      yeah. I had a 5 hour QBR this week with 18 in-person attendees and 7 virtual where we didn’t even take a pee break. I was presenting 90% of it so it’s hard to take my own notes. I give AI the transcript, the virtual note taker, and the slide deck and my personal notes and describe how I want the output and it gives me a recap of the highlights, discussion, action items that then I can email to stakeholders and to project mgmt to set up next step tasks in Asana.

      The one benefit of AI I’ve actually found useful.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      at my last client’s they used SAFe, which basically means they do “big agile”. in practice, this meant that every tenth week was “meeting week”. five days of only retrospectives and planning meetings, including a friday all-hands with over 400 engineers at once. i wish we had virtual note takers that worked.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        “So I’m going to need every 10th week as a vacation… I’m out of vacation days? Well regardless, I’m not showing up.”

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Once you get high enough in corporate hell, all work is meetings and e-mails about meetings. There is nothing else.

      • homoludens@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If I could trust it to consider the same points important that I do and have the same understanding of them.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Really don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. Getting a transcript and summary of an hour long meeting that you weren’t at is so much easier than relying on someone taking and sending you notes.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    How about including mention of wanting to start a union or union activity with everyone in the group and how you are all wanting to join forces as ‘workers of the world uniting!’ … then read as much Karl Marx text as you can in 30 seconds.

    Management would love to see those flags on their alerts from everyone in the office.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      especially with your name attached.

      maybe start with “hey, i’m Michail Bakunin, filling in for chris, and i’m here today to talk about syndicalism”

      • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        🤣🤌🏼 See? It’s just this sort of shit that kept me from locking in on the cubicle monkey grind — not for lack of trying, but for how I contributed. 😜

        Example: once upon a time, there was a merger of two massive telecom brands (let’s call them “Orange” and “Blue”) and one was being subsumed entirely over the course of a year or so — including its complete customer database. Now, most of these accounts were simple enough to update & port, but someone up top decided to draw a line at a certain value and lump together alllll the accounts that were under that floor. Something about not wasting money on pros’ hours for subprime, IIRC.

        Long story short, it took me no time at all to write a script that did exactly what mgmt told us to do ( ~ “zero out all accounts within a certain range on either side of $0.00 via refund or extinguishment”), but since I was paid by the hour and mgmt got bonuses for how well their teams were doing, I made sure my little slop of code didn’t outpace the other teams on the floor. I didn’t take into account how absolutely mind-numbingly challenging it is to be in a cubicle for 8+ hrs/day with nothing at all to do…

        Oh, and to further obfuscate my automation, I set it up on a few office mates’ computers, too. Pretty soon, the whole team was secretly automated and straight up bored AF, so we kinda just took longer and longer lunches, more frequent smoke breaks, shared our music libraries, etc., but kept up the “barely above average, yet dedicated wage slaves” act in front of mgmt.

        Imagine my face when it was not accolades we received once the jig was up. 🤣🖕🏼 Ooohwhee, were they pissed.